Constructive Dismissal

When a resignation can legally amount to an unfair dismissal

Thinking about resigning because of what your employer has done? Get advice before you resign if you possibly can. Constructive dismissal is highly fact-sensitive. The conduct you rely on, what you said to the employer, whether they had a reasonable opportunity to fix the problem, the timing of your resignation and the wording of your resignation can all become important evidence later.

Constructive dismissal is where an employee technically resigns, but the law treats the termination as a dismissal because the real impetus for ending the employment relationship came from the employer. It is not enough that work became unpleasant, stressful or disappointing. The employer's conduct must cross the line into conduct capable of legally causing the resignation.

This distinction matters. If the resignation amounts to constructive dismissal, the employee can potentially pursue an unjustified dismissal Personal Grievance and seek the same kinds of remedies that can arise from a direct dismissal. If it was simply a voluntary resignation, those dismissal remedies may not be available.

The three recognised constructive dismissal situations

New Zealand employment law has long recognised three broad categories of constructive dismissal. The facts do not always fit neatly into one box, but these categories are a useful starting point.

1. “Resign or be dismissed”

The employer effectively gives the employee a choice between resigning and being dismissed. Examples can include telling an employee to resign before they are fired, or presenting resignation as the only realistic alternative to an already-decided dismissal. If this happens, record exactly what was said, who was present and when it occurred.

2. Deliberate pressure designed to make the employee resign

An employer may follow a course of conduct with the deliberate and dominant purpose of coercing the employee to leave. This can be harder to prove because intention matters. Evidence showing repeated unreasonable pressure, isolation, undermining, removal of support or engineered conflict may become important.

3. A serious breach of duty that foreseeably causes resignation

This is a common form of constructive dismissal. The employer may have no intention of making the employee resign. The issue is whether the employer seriously breached obligations owed to the employee, whether that breach caused the resignation, and whether resignation was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the breach.

What can amount to a serious breach?

There is no automatic checklist. The seriousness, persistence and surrounding circumstances matter. One major event can sometimes be enough; in other cases a series of acts or omissions becomes serious when viewed together.

Examples that can raise constructive dismissal issues include:

  • Repeatedly failing to pay wages correctly or on time.
  • Unilaterally making major changes to hours, pay, duties, status or location without proper agreement or process.
  • Failing to deal appropriately with serious bullying, harassment or workplace complaints.
  • Requiring unlawful or plainly unreasonable conduct from the employee.
  • Serious breaches of the employment agreement or minimum employment obligations.
  • Removing work, authority, responsibilities or support in circumstances that effectively undermine the employee's position.
  • Using disciplinary, performance or restructuring processes as a device to drive the employee out rather than genuinely address an employment issue.
  • A sustained course of unjustified treatment that makes continued employment objectively untenable.
Several smaller events can matter together. Constructive dismissal is not limited to one spectacular breach. A course of conduct can be assessed cumulatively where the combined effect is sufficiently serious.

What is usually not enough?

Feeling unhappy at work does not automatically make a resignation constructive dismissal. Employment relationships can be difficult without the employer legally dismissing the employee. Examples that may not, without more, be enough include:

  • A lawful and reasonable instruction you disagree with.
  • A properly-run performance management or disciplinary process.
  • Ordinary workplace conflict or a personality clash.
  • Stress the employer was never told about and had no reasonable opportunity to address.
  • Resigning while the employer is genuinely taking reasonable steps to resolve the problem.

Causation matters: why did you actually resign?

Even if the employer did something wrong, the employee still needs to connect that conduct to the resignation. The employer may argue that the employee resigned for a different reason — another job, personal circumstances, dissatisfaction unrelated to the alleged breach, or simply a desire to leave.

Timing can therefore be important. A resignation immediately following the relevant conduct may present a very different evidential picture from a resignation months later after the employment relationship has apparently returned to normal. Delay does not automatically destroy a claim, but it can make causation and whether a breach was accepted or affirmed more difficult.

Before resigning: raise the problem where reasonably possible

Before resigning, it is often important to tell the employer clearly what the problem is, what conduct needs to stop or be corrected, and what outcome you require. The employer should generally have a reasonable opportunity to respond where the problem is capable of being fixed.

This is not an inflexible rule. There may be circumstances where raising the issue further is unsafe, futile or impractical. But an employee who resigns without clearly raising a fixable problem can later face the argument that the employer never had the chance to put matters right.

A useful written complaint normally identifies:

  • What happened, with dates and specific examples.
  • Why the conduct is unacceptable or inconsistent with the employment relationship.
  • Any relevant documents, messages or witnesses.
  • What you want the employer to do to remedy the problem.
  • A reasonable timeframe for a response where appropriate.
Do not send the resignation email in anger and work out the legal theory afterwards. Where possible, establish the factual record first and get advice on the safest way to proceed.

The resignation letter can become important evidence

If resignation becomes necessary, the letter should accurately record why the employee says the employment relationship is ending. A bare “I resign effective immediately” can leave an unnecessary evidential gap. Equally, a long emotional email containing exaggerations or accusations that cannot be proved can cause its own problems.

The appropriate wording depends on the facts. In some cases notice will be worked; in others the employee may contend that the employer's breach justifies ending employment immediately. That decision should be considered carefully rather than assumed.

Already resigned?

Do not assume you have lost your rights. We can assess what happened before the resignation, what was communicated to the employer, whether the employer's conduct was sufficiently serious, whether it actually caused the resignation, and whether resignation was reasonably foreseeable in the circumstances.

If you resigned in the heat of the moment and are actually trying to withdraw the resignation rather than claim constructive dismissal, see our separate page on Mistake of Resignation.

Evidence that can make or break the case

  • Your employment agreement and later variations.
  • Emails, texts, Teams/Slack messages and written instructions.
  • Meeting invitations, disciplinary or performance documents and meeting notes.
  • Complaints you made and the employer's response.
  • Pay records where wages or contractual entitlements are part of the problem.
  • Evidence of changed duties, hours, status, location or reporting arrangements.
  • A contemporaneous timeline identifying the sequence of events.
  • The resignation letter and any response from the employer.
  • Job-search evidence after employment ends, where lost wages may be claimed.

A recent Employment Court example

Jin v Precision NZ Ltd [2026] NZEmpC 121

The Employment Court found the employee had been constructively dismissed. Relevant employer breaches included failing to provide an employment agreement, requiring the employee to invoice for hours before being paid, failing to provide minimum employee entitlements, and failing to comply with employment and holiday record-keeping obligations.

The Court found the resignation in the face of those breaches was foreseeable. It awarded $10,000 compensation and 12 weeks' lost wages.

Read Employment New Zealand's case summary

Personal Grievance and remedies

Constructive dismissal is a form of unjustified dismissal. Depending on the facts, remedies can include reimbursement of lost wages, compensation for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings, and other remedies available under the Employment Relations Act. Contribution, mitigation and the particular facts can affect any award.

Most Personal Grievances must be raised with the employer within 90 days. Do not wait until all evidence is assembled before checking the deadline. Sexual-harassment grievances have a different notification period.

2026 dismissal rules: constructive dismissal is treated as a type of unjustified dismissal. Different dismissal-PG rules can therefore apply to employees earning at or above the statutory high-income threshold and to employees on a valid trial period. Existing high-income employment can also fall within transitional rules until 21 February 2027. We check which regime applies before advising on a dismissal grievance.

How we approach a constructive dismissal case

We first work out whether resignation should happen at all. Where the employee is still employed, preserving the job while forcing the employer to address the problem can sometimes be the strongest strategy. In other cases the relationship has genuinely reached the point where continued employment is no longer realistic.

If the employment has ended, we identify the legal category, build the chronology and evidence, raise the Personal Grievance where appropriate, and pursue resolution through negotiation or mediation. If settlement cannot be achieved, suitable cases can proceed to the Employment Relations Authority.

Related employment issues

Unfair Dismissal Mistake of Resignation Disciplinary Meeting Exit Package

Before you resign

  1. Save the evidence.
  2. Write a dated timeline.
  3. Identify exactly what the employer has done or failed to do.
  4. Raise the problem in writing where reasonably possible.
  5. Give the employer a reasonable opportunity to fix a fixable problem.
  6. Get advice before sending a resignation.

Send us

  • Employment agreement
  • Key emails and messages
  • Complaints / grievance correspondence
  • Meeting and process letters
  • Your resignation letter, if already sent
  • A short timeline with dates
Start Case Form 0800 WIN KIWI

Already resigned?

Preserve the evidence and get the 90-day Personal Grievance deadline checked immediately. Do not assume a resignation means the employer cannot be challenged.

The questions we test

  • What duty did the employer breach?
  • Was the breach sufficiently serious?
  • Did it actually cause the resignation?
  • Was resignation reasonably foreseeable?
  • Was deliberate pressure being applied?
  • Did the employer have a chance to fix the problem?